Skip to content

The Voice Referendum: Should we vote “Yes”?

Australia stands at a historic crossroads, ready to embark on a journey towards justice, reconciliation, and constitutional recognition. The impending referendum on whether to give constitutional recognition to Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ Voice to the Australian Parliament is a momentous step, born from the profound aspirations of the Uluru Statement from the Heart. Let’s explore the significance of this referendum, its implications, and the moral imperative for a “Yes” vote.

The Voice to Parliament: A First Step in the Uluru Statement from the Heart

The Voice Referendum represents the initial stride in the implementation of the Uluru Statement from the Heart, a profound document crafted by Aboriginal elders. At its core, the statement calls for constitutional recognition of an Indigenous Voice to the Australian Parliament. It’s a call for acknowledgment, representation, and an avenue to ensure that Indigenous voices are heard in the political processes of the nation.

The Power of Constitutional Enshrinement

Why is constitutional recognition so crucial? The Australian constitution serves as the rulebook that governs the politicians. If the Voice is not enshrined in this foundational document, it remains vulnerable to the shifting tides of political ideology. Without constitutional protection, there exists the potential for the rights and aspirations of First Nations peoples to be ignored or overturned by future governments.

Successive governments form parliamentary advisory committees, and disband them regularly. If this advisory committee is protected in the constitution, it will make it hard for racist and far right wing governments to ignore and disband it.

A Personal Perspective: Reckoning with History

For many Australians, like myself, who are descendants of settlers or immigrants, the Voice Referendum presents a complex moral dilemma. It’s a moment to confront the historical injustices perpetuated by colonial powers. It’s acknowledging the pain and suffering endured by First Nations peoples at the hands of the English.

In my case, I am of Anglo-Scottish heritage, and it’s crucial to recognise that the English were the architects of the invasion and subjugation not only of the Australian continent but also of Scotland. The echoes of this history reverberate through generations. Voting “Yes” acknowledges the interconnectedness of these historical injustices and recognises the need for reparations and treaties.

The Path Forward: Treaty, Reparations, and Dignity

A “Yes” vote is not merely about the Voice; it paves the way for a broader discussion about treaties and reparations. It’s an acknowledgement that the pain endured by First Nations peoples must be addressed, and the path to reconciliation must be illuminated.

Addressing the “No” Campaign’s Concerns

The “No” campaign relies on people’s ignorance and plays on unfounded fears. It’s already locked in the votes of racists and pro-colonists, and it’s locking in ignorance, doubt, and fear. In short, it’s deploying toxic politics. They do this with a simple catchy phrase, “If you don’t know, vote ‘no'”, which is overly simplistic and validates ignorance. If you don’t know, FIND OUT!

The “No” campaign, at times, attempts to dilute the discussion with “What about-isms,” what about a voice for immigrants, seniors, and other community groups, but this misses the point and denies recognition of the special place First Nations peoples have. It’s important to clarify that the Voice is not about creating division but about rectifying historical injustices unique to Australia’s First Nations peoples.

In history, choices were made—the English chose invasion over collaboration, genocide over peaceful coexistence, and subjugation over justice. Now, as we seek a just and reconciled future, it’s time for a new choice—a choice for recognition, respect, and restoration. In contrast, in the same era, the Dutch chose to do peaceful trade with various Taiwanese tribes.

All arguments from the No campaign so far looks like they are just wanting to perpetuate racist and genocidal policies against Australia’s First Nations Peoples.

Looking Towards a More Inclusive Future

As the referendum approaches, we find ourselves at a crossroads that will define Australia’s future. A “Yes” vote offers the promise of a more inclusive, just, and reconciled nation—one that acknowledges its past and works towards a brighter future, where the pain and suffering of First Nations peoples can finally find solace. It’s a chance for redemption, a step towards the fulfilment of the Uluru Statement, and an affirmation of the shared values of dignity, respect, and human rights for all Australians.

Reconciliation and meaningful inclusion of Australian Aboriginals in politics would bring forth a multitude of advantages. It would foster a long-overdue recognition of the rich cultural heritage and wisdom of Australia’s First Nations peoples, allowing their voices to shape policies that address the unique challenges and aspirations of Indigenous communities. This inclusion could lead to improved healthcare, education, and employment opportunities, reducing the disparities that have persisted for generations. Additionally, it would promote cultural preservation and revitalisation, strengthening the social fabric of the nation. Ultimately, reconciliation would not only rectify historical injustices but also create a more equitable and harmonious Australia where the contributions and perspectives of Aboriginals are celebrated and integrated into the country’s political landscape, benefiting both Indigenous communities and the nation as a whole.

Learn more at:

Your turn

How do you feel about this? Sign up to comment below.

Leave a Reply